Kirtland high council, Minutes, , Geauga Co., OH, 2 Jan. 1836. Featured version copied [between ca. 4 Apr. and ca. 16 May 1836] in Minute Book 1, pp. 135–136; handwriting of ; CHL. For more complete source information, see the source note for Minute Book 1.
Historical Introduction
On 2 January 1836, a disciplinary council—consisting of two members of the , the president of the , six of the seven senior members of the , and several members of the high councils of , Ohio, and , Missouri—met to discuss charges filed by against on 29 December.
During the previous two months, JS and his brother had engaged in a series of heated disputes, including one that ended in William attacking and injuring JS. Though the brothers exchanged conciliatory letters in mid-December, JS’s journal entry for the morning of New Year’s Day indicates that conflict between the two of them continued to fester and had caused division within the Smith family. “My heart is pained within me because of the difficulty that exists in my fathers family,” JS dictated to his scribe. He added that “the Devil has made a violent attack” on William and , their brother-in-law, and concluded, “The powers of Earth & hell seem combined to overthrow us and the Church by causing a division in the family.”
Later in the day on 1 January, the two brothers finally met in person at JS’s home; according to an account of the meeting recorded in JS’s journal, , , , and were also present. Joseph Smith Sr. opened the meeting with a prayer, after which he “expressed his feelings on the occasion in a verry feeling and pathetic manner even with all the sympathy of a father whose feeling were wounded deeply on the account of the difficulty that was existing in the family.” The journal notes that as Joseph Smith Sr. spoke, “the spirit of God rested down upon us in mighty power, and our hearts were melted.” then “made an humble confession” and asked JS’s forgiveness for “the abuse he had offered.” For his part, JS asked William to forgive him “wherein [he] had been out of the way.” The two men agreed to “build each other up in righteousness, in all things and not listen to evil reports concerning eachother, but like brethren, indeed to go to eachother, with our grievances in the spirit of meekness, and be reconciled and thereby promote our own happiness and the happiness of the family.” , , and , who had apparently been waiting in another room, were then called in to witness the brothers repeat the covenant. The journal documents the relief that JS and others felt, noting that “tears flowed from our eys . . . , and it was truly a jubilee and time of rejoiceing.”
Although the brothers had reconciled, the disciplinary council still met to discuss ’s charges. JS apparently recused himself from the trial but did attend the meeting. Interspersed with more routine church business, the minutes featured here highlight ’s trial and confession before church leaders. The document also chronicles the confession of , who had appeared before the disciplinary council five days prior.
There is nothing in contemporary accounts to indicate who or what prompted the face-to-face meeting. Given that the disciplinary council was scheduled for the following morning, William may have felt compelled to privately reconcile with JS before appearing at the public council.
JS, Journal, 1 Jan. 1836. The account recorded in JS’s history adds that “their hearts melted down in contrition and humility before the Lord.” (JS History, 1834–1836, 168.)
preferred against him <by> Elder and asked the forgiveness of the & and the whole congregation present, He also covenant to make confession before the the same as before this council.
The council on the side of justice arose and expressed their entire satisfaction with his confession and resigned him into the hands of Mercy. A vote was then called of the council and congregation to raise hands if their they were satisfied with his confession, which they did with apparent cheerfulness & with united consent.
President J. Smith Junr. then proposed that & be ordained to the office of in the church of the Latter-Day-Saints on Sunday the 3d Inst. in the public congregation. A Vote was called & carried to that effect.
arose & confessed the charges that were preferred against him by President J Smith Junr. in a former council. A vote was called and carried in his favor and be restored to fellowship in the Church. Voted that be ordained to the office of an Elder
JS’s journal notes that “before entering on the trial, Br. William arose and humbly confessed.” Perhaps owing to this proactive confession, the high council may not have gone through with a formal trial—which according to established protocol should have included comments from members of the council assigned to “prevent insult or injustice” to the accused and from other high council members assigned to see that justice was done on behalf of the church. (JS, Journal, 2 Jan. 1836; Revised Minutes, 18–19 Feb. 1834 [D&C 102:15].)
According to JS’s journal entry for 3 January 1836, William confessed to a larger body of Saints at a worship service the following day and was subsequently “received into fellowship again.” William’s confession, as well as his return to full fellowship with the Saints, lifted an onerous burden from the shoulders of JS. At the conclusion to his journal entry, he added, “This day has been a day of rejoicing to me, the cloud that has been hanging over us has burst with blessings on our heads . . . , and I thank my heavenly father for, the union and harmony which now prevails in the Church.” (JS, Journal, 3 Jan. 1836.)